[Note: Even more disappointing to me is that I have come to the conclusion a generation afterward that Forward was correct. Nanotechnology while not exactly bullshit is close. Half-bullshit let us say. And you know which flavor predominates when you mix half ice cream and half shit (h/t to Mark Steyn). In any event, I believe we are approaching the Bullshit Singularity (that's right the BS), only a few years hence now, when the crescendo of unstoppable mindless crap that has ruled humanity for millennia reaches its cosmic climax. The signs are everywhere. Have you seen the previews for the movie 2012? Think of the rising, out-of-control oceans engulfing the planet as symbolic of rising, out-of-control bullshit engulfing the planet and you have a very effective visual image of exactly where we are heading.
But it hardly matters. Let it be said that progress on the really cool stuff is of nanotechnology after nearly a quarter of a century is all but non-existent: "These (nano) machines could be production machinery for more machines, shortening capital formation times and increasing economic growth rates" (from the Foresight.org website). This aspect, autogenous systems, the Foresight people tell us has been "sorely neglected." Indeed. Complete bust is more like it, guys.
So in the manner of a belated apology, I confess to all who might care that Dr. Forward was right and deeply regret offending him, or at least annoying him. I should have given the thousands I gave to Foresight to him. I'm sure he would have agreed with that. Maybe something cool would have come of it by now. In any event, the vision of Engines of Creation which enthralled me for so many years never came close to coming to pass. Drexler himself hinted in the early 90's he thought the Singularity might happen in the timeframe 2011 - 2015 but he was wrong. Sorry Eric, but I want my money back.]
Forward was an idea man and he was a wonderful writer -- of everything except fiction. in truth, he would have been unpublishable as a novelist except for his technical acuman and even there he had his weaknesses. He was criticized for being on shaky mathematical ground on occasion and his understanding of physics seems at times superficial, but none of these failings mattered. Because he had ideas! He had brilliant, far-reaching, outlandish ideas and of how many scientists, who for all their knowledge are more often stiffs than anything else, can that be said? He was that most remarkable of combinations -- the entrepreneurial scientist. Do you know how rare that is? No one else, in science or science fiction, came close. His death in 2001 was a loss that can never be replaced.
In revisiting his wonderful little article "Spin Drive to the Stars" after 28 years, I hope to make up for my failings in our one an only meeting. I hope to spark interest in his ideas (at least in that piece) again and perhaps get some thoughtful discussion going. That's all I can do. I hope it will be enough.
No comments:
Post a Comment